The judicial dismantling of the crime bills

Mark Golding, Guest Columnist

Last Friday, in deciding what I shall refer to as the Nation and Wright case, the Constitutional Court struck a blow for liberty and the rule of law in Jamaica by ruling that the entire Bail (Interim Provisions for Specified Offences) Act 2010, and most of the provisions in the Bail (Amendment) Act 2010, are unconstitutional and void.

Those two acts were the central pieces of the legislation, often referred to as the six crime bills, which the Government ushered through Parliament in July last year. When those crime bills were being debated, and in the Joint Select Committee which had considered them beforehand, the Opposition and several civil-society groups pointed out the anti-libertarian features of the legislation, and strongly questioned their constitutional status.

The Government would not recant, and proceeded to pass the bills, notwithstanding these serious concerns. Fortunately however, the Opposition's withholding of support for the bills, which have now been struck down by the court, has meant that they did not pass with the two-thirds majority that could have resulted in the human and civil rights guarantees in the Constitution being superseded.

In seeking to mitigate the embarrassment of this judicial dismantling of what it has been trumpeting as one of its achievements in office, the Government's reaction to the court's ruling in the Nation and Wright case has been misleading. Two ministers stated publicly last Friday that the offending legislation was struck down because of the new Charter of Rights. This is absolutely false.

The issue before the court in the Nation and Wright case was the resident magistrate's denial of bail to Mr Nation and Ms Wright in the summer of 2010, long before the new Charter of Rights came into effect. The court struck down the relevant provisions of the legislation because they violated sections and principles enshrined in the old Chapter III of the Constitution. As one of the learned judges put it: "It should be noted that the reference to the Constitution in this judgment is in respect of its provisions which were in force before the passing of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Amendment) Act 2011. That act, which replaced Chapter III (sections 13-26) of the Constitution, was brought into force on 8 April 2011.

Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - News


The judicial dismantling of the crime bills
The judicial dismantling of the crime bills

As one of the learned judges put it: "It should be noted that the reference to the Constitution in this judgment is in respect of its provisions which were in force before the passing of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional



TDSB seeks to clarify stance on Friday prayers in school

"While the TDSB is part of a secular public school system, we exist within a broader context of law and public policy that protects and defends human rights. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protects freedom of religion.



Prayers in public schools
Prayers in public schools

When Shahina Siddiqui resorts to defending her position by name calling after opening her rant with a breathless invocation of Western accomplishments (Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Geneva Convention, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms),



Morocco Moving Ahead with Democratic Reforms Says President of Moroccan Human ...
Morocco Moving Ahead with Democratic Reforms Says President of Moroccan Human ...

By Moroccan American Center for Policy WASHINGTON, July 15, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Morocco is moving forward to implement the new Constitution adopted in its July 1 national vote, which is "a real charter of fundamental rights and freedoms and



Detainees could sue Government for unlawful period of detention

"It should be noted that reference to the Constitution in this judgement is in respect of its provisions which were in force before the passing of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (Constitutional Amendment) Act 2011," stated the Supreme




Scaramouche!: Way to Go, Kafirs!

Imam Dr. Hamid Slimi, Chairman of the Council of Imams said, “We are extremely pleased that Dr. Spence has come out in support of right of Muslim students to hold noon Friday prayers at public schools. These are the basic human rights and religious freedoms granted to all Canadians – adults and children – under our Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Ontario Human Rights Code. Numerous people across faith lines have come forward to support the prayer accommodations at the Valley Park Middle School. These are true Canadians who are not blinded by negativity or hate mongering.” “A true secular democratic society is one that accommodates and respects all cultures and faith practices. The TDSB has provided space for Muslim students to fulfill their religious obligation of Friday prayers, and in no way is this infringing on the rights of any other faith group or affecting curriculum. Attending the prayers is voluntary and the students who attend have parental consent. Freedom of religion also means no one should interfere nor dictate how any faith group offers their prayers. The members of the Canadian Council of Imams unilaterally state that claims and assumptions of indoctrination and extremism at the prayers are absurd, as these are baseless allegations with no hard evidence”, he added.


Twitter

No Alimony Alimony law in Canada violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The justifications for depriving citizens of their rights are false.


Jeff Eggen RT : I have a new law we need to pass. Throw bottles at police, we throw away your protection under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


3PP Movies April 17, 1982: The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Greg Hluska I have a new law we need to pass. Throw bottles at police, we throw away your protection under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.


Graeme M Pickup games of polo is nice though. On spoke shield of one dude is canadian charter of rights and freedoms I think.


Charter Of Rights And Freedoms - Bookshelf

Charter of Rights and Freedoms, fundamental freedoms

Charter of Rights and Freedoms, fundamental freedoms


The Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms


Charter of Rights and Freedoms, fundamental freedoms and mobility rights

Charter of Rights and Freedoms, fundamental freedoms and mobility rights


The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, legal rights

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, legal rights


Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a comparison. --

Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a comparison. --


Check Catalog Directory


Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Wikipedia, the free ...
The Charter guarantees certain political rights to Canadian citizens and civil rights of ... Fundamental freedoms (section 2), namely freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, ...

CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed ...

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights entrenched wihtin Canada's constitution. This version is designed to help unify the people around the ...

Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ...
Section Two of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the section of the ... As a part of the Charter and of the larger Constitution Act, 1982, section 2 ...

Constitutional Documents
Consolidated federal laws of canada ... Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. PART I OF THE CONSTITUTION ...